THE GREATER DEBATE: “THE CREATOR ECONOMY — BUBBLE OR BLUEPRINT?”

Means (narrator):
Before we begin, a gentle reminder to our audience: what you’re about to read is fiction. A dramatization. A stage play dressed up like a debate.

Scott Galloway and MrBeast are real people with real viewpoints—but tonight they’re appearing in a heightened, theatrical version of themselves. Think Hamilton meets CNBC meets one too many espressos.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Now—on with the show.

There’s a special kind of electricity in a room right before two people who should never share a stage… actually share a stage. Tonight, that voltage is crawling through the Wealth & Means studio like static before a storm.

The chairs are set. The cameras hum. Someone in the back is nervously humming the Succession theme, as if to summon gravitas.

To my left:
Scott Galloway, the professor who can turn PowerPoint bullet points into sword strikes. A man who sees the world in data curves and wonders why no one else is panicking.

To my right:
MrBeast, the relentlessly optimistic industrialist of YouTube. The only man alive who can talk about thumbnail optimization with the enthusiasm of a rocket engineer describing a booster separation.

My job tonight is simple: narrate the chaos, capture the atmosphere, and avoid becoming collateral damage.

The topic:
Is the Creator Economy a Bubble… or the Blueprint for the Next Middle Class?

The lights dim.
The room tightens.
The curtain rises.

Scott leans in first, naturally. He carries the confident energy of someone who has come prepared with both charts and a list of grievances.

Scott Galloway:
“The creator economy is a false idol. A tiny sliver gets rich; everyone else gets emotionally wrung out. Median earnings? Laughable. Power laws? Worse than Hollywood.
We’ve told a generation that ‘being famous on the internet’ is a career path. It’s not a middle class—it’s a mirage.”

His words strike like cold water. A few audience members flinch. Someone mutters “statistically true, unfortunately.”

MrBeast sits back—calm, disarming, like a guy used to explaining counterpoints while forklifts whir in the background of his chocolate warehouse.

MrBeast:
“Look, I get the skepticism. But the creator economy isn’t broken—it’s just being misunderstood.
Most people fail because they treat it like a dream, not like a business.
But if you reinvest, iterate, study the platform, and never stop improving, the opportunity is real.
It’s not guaranteed—but it’s real.”

A split opens in the room.
Half nod with Scott’s realism.
Half nod with Jimmy’s optimism.
Everyone leans forward.

Now we descend into Scott’s favorite cave: the one where numbers live.

Scott Galloway:
“Let me be clear: this is the most unequal attention economy in history.
Ninety-nine percent of creators make less than minimum wage.
Platforms capture the value. Creators capture burnout.
Calling this a path to the middle class is like calling a lottery ticket ‘retirement planning.’”

He punctuates the last sentence with a sharp tap of the table.

Jimmy absorbs it all, expression steady, calculating.

MrBeast:
“Sure—the power law is real. But it’s real in every entrepreneurial space.
What’s different now?
A kid with a phone can reach millions for free.
Tools are cheaper. Distribution is democratized.
Creators aren’t just entertainers—they’re becoming businesses, educators, product lines, local brands.
Most small businesses fail too—but we don’t call small business a ‘bubble.’”

Scott tilts his head—half intrigued, half unconvinced.

The air shifts. The conversation becomes heavier, quieter.

Scott Galloway:
“My concern is emotional.
The algorithm is a boss who never loves you.
Creators tie their self-worth to a machine designed to manipulate dopamine.
This isn’t a career ladder—it’s a psychological treadmill with no off-switch.”

A hush falls.
Somewhere, a ring light powers down in existential dread.

Jimmy steps forward—not combative, but real.

MrBeast:
“I relate to that.
But you can manage it if you treat content like craft instead of validation.
I’m not emotionally tied to views—I’m tied to improving the product.
And honestly? People find meaning in creating stuff.
Most traditional jobs are emotionally draining too—we just don’t talk about it.”

A ripple of recognition moves through the crowd.

We arrive at the center of the maze.

Scott Galloway:
“This is a bubble because it relies on fantasy.
Platform economics mean only a microscopic elite will ever thrive.
This isn’t a middle class—it’s a casino with exceptional marketing.”

MrBeast:
“It’s a blueprint because it’s still evolving.
Creators build brands, hire teams, launch products, create jobs.
The scaffolding of a new middle class is forming—you just have to view it through entrepreneurship, not stardom.”

Two visions.
Two futures.
Two truths colliding onstage.

The spotlight catches them both—Scott’s skepticism sharp as glass, Jimmy’s optimism glowing like a warehouse full of LED softboxes.

No easy winner.
No neat resolution.

Which is perfect.
Because the real value of a debate isn’t deciding who’s right—
it’s realizing that both arguments are wrestling with the same question from opposite ends of the future.

The crowd rises.
The room exhales.
The curtain drifts down.

And our little fiction leaves you with this:
We may not know whether the creator economy is a bubble or a blueprint—
but we do know it’s a story still being written.

Disclaimer: The celebrity portrayals in this episode are theatrical interpretations created for storytelling. The real individuals were not involved and do not endorse this program.